All ideas

Currently it is only possible to filter by "is" comparisons - as a user I should be able to filter by content that "is not" a value similar to how I can set "is not" in content targeting.

When defining inputs for models, it can get overwhelming to manage a long list of individual inputs—especially when multiple inputs are related to the same section of the model. For example, if you're building a hero section, you might define inpu...

Currently when adding a new user to multiple spaces the users role within those spaces defaults to Designer. An option to select a user role when adding them to multiple spaces would be very helpful so that an admin doesn't have to enter each spac...

Currently it only tracks custom components that are being used, would be great to track builder-provided components as well

Allow user to select which data model field value to display in a reference field, currently it only shows the record name

Can a feature to be developed to allow a default tenant to be determined for a multi-tenanted system.

We would love to have our internal team review website updates through Builder.io's website preview links before publishing and have those comments appear directly inside Builder.io. This would be incredibly useful as we currently design things in...

When confronted with a repo that has image files on git LFS, Builder is unable to fetch them. Response when given the commands to fetch git lfs data:"I'll run the git lfs commands to fetch the missing data. I cannot run the git lfs commands due to...

Currently, Builder.io applies permissions at the content/model level, but lacks granular field-level control. Here's why field-level permissions are crucial: Sensitive Data Protection Different fields require different security levels: Pricing i...