Permissions based on Data model fields

Currently, Builder.io applies permissions at the content/model level, but lacks granular field-level control. Here's why field-level permissions are crucial:

Sensitive Data Protection
Different fields require different security levels:

• Pricing information should only be editable by finance/admin roles

• SEO metadata might be restricted to marketing specialists

• Internal notes/comments should be hidden from external collaborators

• Publishing status should be controlled by content managers only

Role-Based Field Access
Teams need granular control based on responsibilities:

• Content Writers: Can edit title, body, tags but not publishing settings

• Editors: Can modify content and meta fields but not pricing

• Admins: Full access to all fields including sensitive configurations

• Reviewers: Read-only access to content, write access to approval status

Current Limitations
Without field-level permissions:

• Users get all-or-nothing access to content models

• Sensitive fields are exposed to users who don't need them

• Workflow bottlenecks occur when simple edits require admin intervention

• Risk of accidental modifications to critical fields

Business Benefits of Field-Level Permissions

• Enhanced Security: Protect sensitive business data at the field level

• Improved Workflow: Users can edit what they need without admin dependency

• Reduced Errors: Prevent accidental changes to fields outside user expertise

• Compliance: Meet regulatory requirements for data access control

• Better Collaboration: Multiple roles can work on same content safely