All ideas

It would be great to add multiple choice in enums of text field or create a separate built-in field type. Also addig multiple references in Reference field type would be great.

Many people who use Builder.io would like to be able to register custom components in the same way that is available in the React JS SDK.

This is potentially an edge case, but I just had a need for it arise, so I thought I'd submit it. What I'd like to see is the ability to exclude targeting parameters like URL Path. Example: I have a Section (an Announcement Bar) that I'd like to s...

I've been working with refs and symbols a lot and there are two behaviors of the content API that seem strange to me: You have to opt into includeRefs: true and noTraverse: false. The API doesn't recursively evaluate refs (https://github.com/Build...

Sometimes you dont want to create a new Component or override and existing one, you only want to add some addtional styles to the "Basic Components" for example, you could add a margin-bottom: ... to the "Text Component"

You can use ref.ref inside content JS when using the React SDK to reference the DOM element for the content item, but this feature isn't provided for the other SDKs. This is a very useful feature when you want to manipulate the DOM for just the co...

You can use ref.onStateChange inside content JS when using the React SDK, but this feature isn't provided for the other SDKs. This is an important feature when using content JS inside of complex symbols. For cross-compatibility and functionality, ...

This could be a dealbreaker for us, since we have teams all over the world. Builder is nearly perfect other than this!

Create a React component that allows components that use withChildren to render a drop zone when no children are present. This would help in the case when the defaultChildren are deleted or not present. import { ChildDropZone, withChildren } from ...

From customer: I am trying to add a slug field for content type models, but right now the only option that really works for this is the “text” field type. Unfortunately, text fields on content models do not allow any real validation (outside of “r...